Adaptation and validation of the School Violence Questionnaire-Revised in Chilean secondary education (Adaptación y validación del Cuestionario de Violencia Escolar-Revisado en educación secundaria chilena)

Contenido principal del artículo

Juan Rubio-González
Felipe Guerra-Díaz
Pierina Agurto-Monárdez

Resumen

Abstract: The study aimed to culturally adapt and analyze the psychometric properties of the School Violence Questionnaire-Revised (CUVE-R) in secondary school students in Chile. Using an instrumental design, linguistic and cultural adaptation was conducted following international guidelines, with content validity being evaluated by 12 experts using Aiken's V coefficient (mean V = .89). The sample consisted of 810 students from four public schools in the Atacama Region. Through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses with cross-validation, a six-factor structure was obtained across 29 items: teacher violence toward students, physical and instrumental violence, verbal violence among students, discrimination, disruption and aggression toward teachers, and cyberbullying, which does not replicate the original eight-factor structure reported in Spain. The bifactor model showed the best overall fit (CFI = .961; TLI = .954; RMSEA = .061; SRMR = .059), and the unidimensionality indices (ωH = .727; ECV = .520) indicated that the instrument is genuinely multidimensional, ruling out the use of a total score. Reliability was satisfactory across all subscales (α = .712 - .873; ω = .730 – .882), and scalar invariance by sex was verified. In conclusion, the Chilean version of the CUVE-R constitutes a valid and reliable instrument for multidimensional assessment of school violence, and its interpretation through independent subscales is recommended.


Keywords: school violence; cultural adaptation; psychometric properties; secondary education; school coexistence.


Resumen: El estudio tuvo como objetivo adaptar culturalmente y analizar las propiedades psicométricas del Cuestionario de Violencia Escolar-Revisado (CUVE-R) en estudiantes de educación secundaria de Chile. Mediante un diseño instrumental, se realizó la adaptación lingüística y cultural siguiendo directrices internacionales, evaluando la validez de contenido con 12 expertos mediante el coeficiente V de Aiken (promedio V = ,89). La muestra fue de 810 estudiantes de cuatro establecimientos públicos de la Región de Atacama. Mediante análisis factorial exploratorio y confirmatorio con validación cruzada, se obtuvo una estructura de seis factores sobre 29 ítems —violencia del profesorado hacia el alumnado, violencia física e instrumental, violencia verbal entre estudiantes, discriminación, disrupción y agresión al profesorado, y ciberviolencia— que no replica la estructura original de ocho factores desarrollada en España. El modelo bifactor presentó el mejor ajuste global (CFI = ,961; TLI = ,954; RMSEA = ,061; SRMR = ,059), y los índices de unidimensionalidad (ωH = ,727; ECV = ,520) indicaron que el instrumento es genuinamente multidimensional, descartando el uso de una puntuación total. La confiabilidad fue satisfactoria en todas las subescalas (α = ,712 – ,873; ω = ,730 – ,882) y se verificó invarianza escalar por sexo. Se concluye que la versión chilena del CUVE-R constituye un instrumento válido y confiable para evaluar multidimensionalmente la violencia escolar, recomendándose su interpretación mediante subescalas independientes.


Palabras clave: violencia escolar; adaptación cultural; propiedades psicométricas; educación secundaria; convivencia escolar.


Resumo: O estudo teve como objetivo adaptar culturalmente e analisar as propriedades psicométricas do Questionário de Violência Escolar-Revisado (CUVE-R) em estudantes do ensino médio do Chile. Por meio de um delineamento instrumental, realizou-se a adaptação linguística e cultural seguindo diretrizes internacionais, avaliando a validade de conteúdo com 12 especialistas mediante o coeficiente V de Aiken (média V = ,89). A amostra foi composta por 810 estudantes de quatro escolas públicas da Região de Atacama. Por meio de análise fatorial exploratória e confirmatória com validação cruzada, obteve-se uma estrutura de seis fatores com 29 itens —violência do professor em relação aos alunos, violência física e instrumental, violência verbal entre estudantes, discriminação, disrupção e agressão ao professor, e ciberviolência— que não replica a estrutura original de oito fatores desenvolvida na Espanha. O modelo bifatorial apresentou o melhor ajuste global (CFI = ,961; TLI = ,954; RMSEA = ,061; SRMR = ,059), e os índices de unidimensionalidade (ωH = ,727; ECV = ,520) indicaram que o instrumento é genuinamente multidimensional, descartando o uso de uma pontuação total. A confiabilidade foi satisfatória em todas as subescalas (α = ,712 – ,873; ω = ,730 – ,882) e verificou-se invariância escalar por sexo. Conclui-se que a versão chilena do CUVE-R constitui um instrumento válido e confiável para avaliar multidimensionalmente a violência escolar, recomendando-se sua interpretação por meio de subescalas independentes.


Palavras-chave: violência escolar; adaptação cultural; propriedades psicométricas; ensino secundário; convivência escolar.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Detalles del artículo

Cómo citar
Rubio-González, J., Guerra-Díaz, F., & Agurto-Monárdez, P. (2026). Adaptation and validation of the School Violence Questionnaire-Revised in Chilean secondary education (Adaptación y validación del Cuestionario de Violencia Escolar-Revisado en educación secundaria chilena). Ibero-American Journal of Psychology and Public Policy, 3(2), 220–246. https://doi.org/10.56754/2810-6598.2026.0074
Sección
Artículos

Citas

Abregú-Crespo, R., Garriz-Luis, A., Ayora, M., Martín-Martínez, N., Cavone, V., Carrasco, M., Fraguas, D., Martín-Babarro, J., Arango, C., & Díaz-Caneja, C. (2024). School bullying in children and adolescents with neurodevelopmental and psychiatric conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 8(2), 122-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(23)00289-4

Aiken, L. R. (1980). Content validity and reliability of single items or questionnaires. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40(4), 955–959. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448004000419

Álvarez-García, D., Núñez, J., Rodríguez, C., Álvarez, L., & Dobarro, A. (2011). Propiedades psicométricas del Cuestionario de Violencia Escolar-Revisado (CUVE-R). Revista de Psicodidáctica, 16(1), 59–83. http://hdl.handle.net/10651/6888

American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct (2002, amended effective June 1, 2010, and January 1, 2017). https://www.apa.org/ethics/code

Ato, M., López, J., & Benavente, A. (2013). Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicología. Anales de Psicología, 29(3), 1038–1059. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511

Badura, P., Eriksson, C., García-Moya, I., Löfstedt, P., Melkumova, M., & Sotiroska, K. (2024). A focus on adolescent social contexts in Europe, central Asia and Canada. Health Behaviour in School-aged Children international report from the 2021/2022 survey (Vol. 7). WHO Regional Office for Europe. https://www.who.int/europe/publications/i/item/9789289061391

Beaton, D., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186–3191. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014

Benavides-Moreno, N., Donoso-Díaz, S., Reyes-Araya, D., & Salas, V. (2024). Violencia escolar en Chile: desafíos desde la visión docente. Cadernos de Pesquisa, 54, e10528. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980531410528

Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5

Cipriano, C., Ha, C., Wood, M., Sehgal, K., Ahmad, E., & McCarthy, M. (2024). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of universal school-based SEL programs in the United States: Considerations for marginalized students. Social and Emotional Learning: Research, Practice, and Policy, 3, 100029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sel.2024.100029

Escuadra, C., Magallanes, K., Lee, S., & Young, J. (2023). Systematic analysis on school violence and bullying using data mining. Children and Youth Services Review, 150, 107020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107020

Finney, S. J., & DiStefano, C. (2006). Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 269–314). Information Age Publishing.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104

Gaffney, H., Ttofi, M., & Farrington, D. (2021). Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying perpetration and victimization: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 17(2), e1143. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1143

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30(2), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289447

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Kamaruddin, I., Ma’rof, A., Mohd-Nazan, A., & Ab-Jalil, H. (2023). A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions to decrease cyberbullying perpetration and victimization: An in-depth analysis within the Asia Pacific region. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, 1014258. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1014258

Kuzmanic, D., & Valenzuela, J. (2024). Post-pandemic learning trajectories in oral reading proficiency: Results from twelve Chilean schools. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 10, 100995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100995

Ley 19.628 de Protección de la Vida Privada. (1999, August 28). Diario Oficial de la República de Chile. https://www.bcn.cl/leychile/navegar?idNorma=141599

López, V., Carrasco-Aguilar, C., Jervis, P., Torres-Vallejos, J., Ramírez, M., González, J., & Franulic, A. (2025). Qualitative evaluation of the feasibility of a national whole-school program for reducing school violence and improving school climate in Chile. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1471235. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1471235

Matjasko, J., Vivolo-Kantor, A., Massetti, G., Holland, K., Holt, M., & Cruz, J. (2012). A systematic meta-review of evaluations of youth violence prevention programs: Common and divergent findings from 25 years of meta-analyses and systematic reviews. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(6), 540–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.06.006

Montoya, Y. (2024). Estudios sobre convivencia escolar en Chile en los últimos 10 años. Revista Reflexión e Investigación Educacional, 6(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.22320/reined.v6i1.6459

Muñoz-Quezada, M., Saavedra, E., & Villalta, M. (2007). Percepciones y significados sobre la convivencia y violencia escolar de estudiantes de cuarto medio de un liceo municipal de Chile. Revista de Pedagogía, 28(82), 197-224. http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0798-97922007000200003&lng=es&tlng=es

Neut, P. (2017). Las violencias escolares en el escenario educativo chileno. Análisis crítico del estado del arte. Calidad en la Educación, (46), 222-247. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-45652017000100222

Orovio, C. (2024). Psicopatología y consecuencias clínicas del acoso escolar: Una revisión sistemática según las directrices PRISMA. Revista Scientific, 9(32), 41-61. https://doi.org/10.29394/scientific.issn.2542-2987.2024.9.32.2.41-61

Penfield, R. D., & Giacobbi, P. R. (2004). Applying a score confidence interval to Aiken's item content-relevance index. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 8(4), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327841mpee0804_3

Polanin, J., Espelage, D., Grotpeter, J., Ingram, K., Michaelson, L., Spinney, E., Valido, A., Sheikh, A., Torgal, C., & Robinson, L. (2022). A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Interventions to Decrease Cyberbullying Perpetration and Victimization. Prevention Science: the Official Journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 23(3), 439–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-021-01259-y

Puma-Maque, O., & Cárdenas-Zúñiga, M. (2024). Bullying y ciberbullying en el contexto peruano (2017-2021): una revisión sistemática. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 22(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.11600/rlcsnj.22.1.6163

R Core Team. (2024). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 4.3.3). R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/

Reise, S. P., Scheines, R., Widaman, K. F., & Haviland, M. G. (2013). Multidimensionality and structural coefficient bias in structural equation modeling: A bifactor perspective. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164412449831

Revelle, W. (2024). psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research (R package version 2.4.3). Northwestern University. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych

Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02

Tijmes, C. (2012). Violencia y Clima Escolar en Establecimientos Educacionales en Contextos de Alta Vulnerabilidad Social de Santiago de Chile. Psykhe, 21(2), 105-117. http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-22282012000200009&lng=es&tlng=es

World Health Organization. (2020). Global status report on preventing violence against children 2020. WHO-UNICEF.

Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(6), 806–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006288127